AEF’s Visiting Professor Program

Apply now to the AEF’s Visiting Professor Program!

The AEF invites you to apply to the Visiting Professor Program. The VPP immerses professors into the world of marketing and advertising, to inform your research and teaching, while extending your academic network within one week. Because of Covid-19, all sessions will be done via virtually.

Find out more by clicking here.

Qualified professors will participate in the VPP and learn from executives at Ogilvy, McCann, IBM and others. So, what are you waiting for?  Read more about the VPP and apply!

Application deadline is February 15, 2021!

Questions?
Sharon Hudson, VP, Program Manager
AEF

646-708-8114

< Calls and Nominations

IDL Fellows

Universities listed are at the time of graduation from the IDL program.

IDL Jennifer McGill Fellows 2024-25

1. Lucina Austin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2. Dhiman Chattopadhyay, Shippensburg University
3. Meredith D. Clark, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
4. Marlene Neill, Baylor University
5. Juliet Pinto, Pennsylvania State University
6. Erica Salkin, Whitworth University
7. Adina Schneeweis, Oakland University
8. Amy Simons, University of Missouri

IDL Jennifer McGill Fellows 2023-24

1. MASUDUL BISWAS, Loyola University Maryland
2. BILL CASSIDY, Northern Illinois University
3. DEBORAH CHUNG, University of Kentucky
4. SYDNEY DILLARD, DePaul University
5. NATHANIEL FREDERICK II, Winthrop University
6. YOUNGAH LEE, Ball State University
7. REGINA LUTTRELL, Syracuse University
8. NATHIAN SHAE RODRIGUEZ, San Diego State University

IDL Jennifer McGill Fellows 2022-23

1. JAN LAUREN BOYLES, Iowa State University
2. KATIE FOSS, Middle Tennessee State University
3. HILARY FUSSELL SISCO, Quinnipiac University
4. CHERYL ANN LAMBERT, Kent State University
5. HOLLY OVERTON, Penn State University
6. JESSICA RETIS, University of Arizona
7. JAE-HWA SHIN, University of Southern Mississippi
8. GABRIEL B. TAIT, Ball State University

IDL Fellows 2020-21

1. Mia Long Anderson, Azusa Pacific University
2. David Brown, Temple University
3. Tamara Zellars Buck, Southeast Missouri State University
4. Moonhee Cho, University of Tennessee Knoxville
5. Celeste Gonzalez de Bustamante, University of Arizona
6. Miao Guo, Ball State University
7. Ammina Kothari, Rochester Institute
8. Gerry Lanosga, Indiana University
9. Ingrid Sturgis, Howard University
10. Bruno Takahashi, Michigan State University

IDL Fellows 2019-20

1. Adedayo (“Dayo”) Abah, Washington and Lee University
2. Saleem Alhabash, Michigan State University
3. Vanessa Bravo, Elon University
4. Rockell Brown Burton, Texas Southern University
5. Maria De Moya, DePaul University
6. Felicia McGhee, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
7. Suman Mishra, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
8. Jennifer Potter, Towson University
9. Gi Woong Yun, University of Nevada, Reno

IDL Fellows 2018-19

1. Margaretha Geertsema-Sligh, Butler University
2. Herman Howard, Angelo State University
3. Jeannine E. Relly, University of Arizona
4. Yong Volz, University of Missouri
5. Mia Moody-Ramirez, Baylor University
6. Vera Walker Hawkins, Texas Southern University
7. Uche Onyebadi, Texas Christian University
8. Jennifer Vardeman, University of Houston
9. Weiwu Zhang, Texas Tech University

IDL Fellows 2016-17

1. Linda Aldoory, University of Maryland
2. Laura Castaneda, University of Southern California
3. Jerry Crawford, University of Kansas
4. Calvin Hall, North Carolina Central University
5. Karie Hollerbach, Southeast Missouri State University
6. Maria Len-Rios, University of Georgia
7. Herb Lowe, University of Florida
8. Emily Metzgar, Indiana University

IDL Fellows 2015-16

1. Carolyn Bronstein, DePaul University
2. Jean Grow, Marquette University
3. Susan Keith, Rutgers University
4. Kathleen McElroy, Oklahoma State University
5. Gwyneth Mellinger, Xavier University
6. Donica Mensing, University of Nevada Reno
7. Marquita Smith, John Brown University
8. Alice Tait, Central Michigan University

Return to IDL

Research You Can Use

Research You Can Use highlights research from AEJMC refereed journals that may interest journalists and others for use in continuing education. Articles are contributed by the editors of AEJMC refereed journals.

Journal of Advertising Education

The Journal of Advertising Education is devoted to research and commentary on instruction, curriculum and leadership in advertising education.

• Enhancing Student Segmentation Skills and Targeting Knowledge

Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs

Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs presents in-depth research on specific topics within journalism and mass communication on subjects ranging from journalism history and personalities to international mass communication.

• Monograph Explores Cultural Politics of Colorism in India
• New study shows how journalism ethics developed

Journal of Public Relations Research

Journal of Public Relations Research provides scholarly criticism of public relations practice, and helps to develop the history, ethics, and philosophy of public relations.

• Partisanship Influences Perceptions of Communications from Government Agencies

Newspaper Research Journal

Newspaper Research Journal comprehensively answers questions about U.S. newspaper performance and related topics of interest, ranging from balance and fairness to the use of computer analysis in newspaper reporting.

• Study Shows the Rise in Use of Online Forums
• Study ranks blogs’ use of traditional media as sources in 2006 election
• The larger a newspaper’s local population, the broader its online market
• Marijuana coverage framed differently in editorials, op-eds
• President had limited framing power in stem cell debate
• Meeting coverage changes with newsroom cutbacks
• Citizen Journalism Sites Complement Newspapers
• Study: Values, Ethics of Sports Reporters Vary by Beat

Journal of Communication Inquiry

The Journal of Communication Inquiry (JCI) focuses on research that examines media and communication from a critical, cultural, and historical perspective.

• Hardt And Negri’s “Empire” Foreshadows Wall Street Protests

Journalism & Mass Communication Educator

Journalism & Mass Communication Educator focuses on learning and teaching, curriculum, educational leadership, and related exploration of higher education within a context of journalism and mass communication.

• No Evidence that Accredited Journalism Schools are Better than Unaccredited Ones
• Nontraditional Online News Media Seek Employees with Adaptive Expertise

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly

Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly focuses on research in journalism and mass communication, developments in theory and methodology of communication, international communication, journalism history, and social and legal problems.

• News Paywalls – Should They Cost Less in Poorer Countries?
• Should News Organizations Be in the “Reunion” Business?
• The push for paywalls mischaracterizes the nature of online newspaper readership
• Dimensions of News Media Brand Personality
• Users say participation in news sites’ online forums helps them understand their communities better
• Climate Change and the Belief Gap Hypothesis
• Citizens’ Local Political Knowledge Threatened By New Media
• Viewing Media Coverage of Terrorism Related to Posttraumatic Stress Reactions; Youth Particularly Susceptible
• Science and media disconnect? Maybe not, says a new study

Mass Communication and Society

Mass Communication and Society publishes articles from a wide variety of perspectives and approaches that advance mass communication theory, especially at the societal or macrosocial level.

• Hispanics in Politics
• Why conservatives are a political force in America
• New research finds Fox News exhibited a Kerry bias in 2004 election
• Retaliatory aggression and the effects of point of view blood in violent video games

AEJMC Rescinds 2019 Presidential Award

August 31, 2020

The following statement has been issued by the Board of Directors of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC).

Recently published information resulting from a journalist’s FOIA request suggests that AEJMC’s 2019 Presidential Award designee Will Norton engaged in communication, including responding to highly questionable communication from a third party, that does not align with AEJMC’s Code of Ethics, particularly two core values:

• Justice: AEJMC members strive for fairness, impartiality, and distributive justice in our relationships with peers, students, and other stakeholders. We celebrate and promote diversity.”
• Caring: AEJMC members act with respect, sensitivity, consideration of others, compassion, and mercy. We try to protect others from abuse and coercion.

In a duly called meeting, a quorum of the AEJMC Board of Directors met with some members of the Association of Schools of Journalism and Mass Communication (ASJMC) Board and, after discussion, the AEJMC board voted to rescind the award.

The AEJMC Code of Ethics is available here: http://www.aejmc.com/home/2011/03/ethics-preamble/

Ways to Get Involved in AEJMC

You are part of a special community!

Make the most of your AEJMC membership using this helpful information.

Presenting research
·        Proposal a panel to a division or interest group (deadline is Sept. 15^th)
·        Submit an individual or coauthored paper to the refereed paper competition (deadline is April 1^st). If accepted, you will present your paper alongside others with similar topics or present in a poster-format at the scholar-to-scholar session.

Attending the conference
·        Refereed research paper sessions (traditional, scholar-to-scholar, high density)
·        Panel sessions
·        Spotlight sessions
·        The exhibit hall
·        The keynote and opening reception
·        Off-site trips
·        Socials
·        Meetings

Serving AEJMC for the conference
·        Reviewing papers for a division or interest group (month of April)
·        Serving as a discussant at the conference (usually one per session, 4-8 papers)
·        Moderating a session at the conference

Serving in longer-term positions
·        As an officer in a division or interest group (usually one year per role)
·        In an elected position

Best Practices by Role for AEJMC Virtual Conference

Tips from the AEJMC Teaching Committee

Media Literacy as a Way of Living

By Ralph Beliveau
AEJMC Standing Committee
on Teaching
University of Oklahoma

(Article courtesy of AEJMC News, July 2020 issue)

We are experiencing difficult challenges as teachers and educators. The pandemic undermines the structure of higher education and demands instantaneous changes to our practices and the time and space relationships of teaching and learning. Secondly, the social tensions connected to race and justice have called on us to rethink how students, staff and colleagues of color have different experiences than white people who have positions of privilege, regardless of any intersectional configuration we may have. Finally, the positions of knowledge, information and media may create less clarity and increase confusion in our culture.

As an advocate for the transformational power of media literacy, I find that the work that I have done with students, colleagues and fellow media literacy scholars is ongoing, immediately vital, and in need of constant care and attention. Media literacy is not something achieved in the rear view mirror. In fact, McLuhan suggested that the rear view mirror is not the best way to move into the future: “When faced with a totally new situation, we tend always to attach ourselves to the objects, to the flavor of the most recent past. We look at the present through a rear‐view mirror. We march backwards into the future.” (McLuhan, Medium is the Massage, 1967).

This will not serve us well as a strategy to think about our present challenges, any more than a completely textual literacy, or a televisual literacy, is a good enough accomplishment (in the rear‐view mirror) to negotiate the present challenges in all their digital splendor.

Media literacy offers a corrective to the distortions that the past imposes on the present. But it only works through a constant state of interrogation and re‐interrogation. The questions we ask (and re‐ask) can be thought of in different ways. Typically, media literacy at any moment adopts a clear‐eyed posture and asks of a media experience:

• Who created this message?
• Which techniques are used to attract attention?
• How might different people interpret this message?
• Which values, lifestyles and points of view are represented… or are absent?
• Why is this message being sent?

We may have asked these questions in the past, about a particular mediated moment, but those answers may not be enough to work in the present. More important, asking these questions needs to be a habit, a way of interacting with the media world of the present moment to gain answers to the questions we face in these recent challenges.

This set of questions represents the deep dive approach. A different approach that comes out of an emphasis on information literacy is less invested in the deep dive, taking a faster strategy that seeks to verify the validity of what we might see or hear —especially before we go about repeating it (reposting, memeing, retweeting, etc.), and even before we consider how we feel about it. This quicker approach suggests you don’t think too hard about the claims you see and hear till you determine its value — is it true, or misinformation, or disinformation? This approach, “The Four Moves,” suggests:

• Check for previous work. (See if someone else has already fact‐checked the claim or provided a synthesis of research.)
• Go upstream to the source (…of the claim. Most web content is not original.).
• Read laterally. (Read what other people say about the source [publication, author, etc.]. The truth is in the network.)
• Circle back. (If you get lost, or hit dead ends, or find yourself going down an increasingly confusing rabbit hole, back up and start over knowing what you know now. You’re likely to take a more informed path with different search terms and better decisions.)

(For more, see Mike Caufield’s free pub Web Literacy for Student fact Checkers, https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/front‐matter/web‐strategies‐for‐student‐fact‐checkers/)

The result is a digitally oriented fact‐checking process that uses the tools available to us individually and collectively to get to that clear‐eyed perspective before we have invested too much time in it.

Either approach brings to our attention and the attention of our students how what we are learning is fundamentally tied to how we are learning. And, again, the process is not once‐and‐done.

For example, one thing we have learned in the recent educational environment is that online is different from face‐2‐face teaching and learning. The change sets up an interesting opportunity for either approach to the higher education experience. How does a program like Zoom, or our Learning Management System design, or our choices about synchronous vs. asynchronous change the teaching and learning experience? And what would students learn from considering such questions?

These are medium choices, and we should subject them to the same kind of critical interrogation that we would use to become, say, media literate about Zoom, or Canvas, etc. Our students are certainly aware, but do they consciously know and talk about that awareness? For example, how does it affect learning to be facing the “Brady Bunch” grid for a class that includes an image of you, the viewer? You can see what you look like while you are trying to learn. What effect is that having?

Now, back to the current challenges. How have we addressed the social world differently in an institution of shared isolation? In the transition, the digital world was full of suggestions from teachers, technologists and even students; don’t do synchronous, don’t make students turn their cameras on, dress professionally for Zoom appearances, don’t use weird backgrounds (which I completely ignore), try not to appear like you are being held hostage, or asleep, or more interested in your cat than you should, etc. But perhaps at some point we can subject the characteristics of the new environment to both types of interrogation suggested above. Learning that understands the health and social consequences of our actions, that takes the deep dive, may prepare us to recognize good and bad scientific or statistical information, perhaps even save lives. Even going through four moves would indicate that sources that blamed 5G networks for Corona virus were sketchy. But then we can interrogate the conspiracy theories, both to see their fact‐free‐ness, and to perhaps consider who gains power when another group feels lost, confused and disillusioned. And what are the characteristics of the social, digital and traditional media that spread the confusion?

We face a different challenge in our classrooms when it comes to racial justice. The murder of George Floyd was the immediate cause for a broad‐based protest movement. As we watch the coverage – mixed between local, national and international mainstream media, as well as live streams on social media of protest activities and police responses – our immediate reactions need to be informed by the history (the rear‐view, if you will). I am finishing these thoughts on the 99th anniversary of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. Our digital environment gives us access to the history that includes that moment, as well as the numerous other incidents of violence against people of color, at a moment where evidence in the digital world is having a new and profound influence. Tulsa 1921 was brushed over and ignored for decades (see https://www.vox.com/identities/2020/5/31/21276084/tulsa‐race‐massacre‐black‐wall‐street‐protests‐george‐floyd, and read Rilla Askew’s novel Fire In Beulah [2001]). We ought to talk to our students about what these videos — this evidence — means, so that mobile phone, body cam, and other witness footage is understood for all of its ethical complication, and its meaning to complex issues of justice.

The world of video evidence is a new and pervasive reality. We need to work hard as educators in real and virtual classrooms to give students the tools to understand the complexities of this environment. Using media literacy practices and habits to empower our students is our calling, because otherwise the advances in technology, the complexity of media economics and the churn of media regulation will be foreign and alienating to them. On the other hand, having different sets of skills to critically interrogate whatever is ahead for us and them may get us in the habit of realizing that media literacy is not a fait accompli but a discipline that we ought to instill in ourselves and our students.

<Teaching Corner